Horse and Carriage in NYC
In January, a horse and carriage accident occurred in NYC when a horse became spooked and crashed into a station wagon. The inexperienced driver was thrown from the carriage receiving serious injuries. The horse suffered from a broken leg and was euthanized. The complete story can be found at NY Daily News.
During our class discussions, three definitive stances were taken on the controversy that stemmed from the horse and carriage accident in NYC. They went as follows: those in favor of keeping the horse drawn carriages, those in favor of removing the horse and carriages from the city streets and those who did not have a strong opinion for or against the issue. I was in the group in support of keeping the horse drawn carriages in the city. Our arguments for keeping the carriage business began with statics on horse and carriage accidents within the city. It was discovered that the occurrences were very low for accidents that resulted in the injury of the driver, others, and the death of a horse. Our second point of argument came from the vast amount of people to be affected by the termination of the horse and carriage business. The circle of influence extends far beyond the drivers and owners. Other areas that we felt needed to be clarified were: the recognition of the mounted police officers in NYC and the following question of where does one draw the line to the use of horses within the city; the fact that euthanasia is the primary method of treating a horse once it has become injured. It is very difficult and very expensive to operate on an injured horse. The recovery time and intensive care needed after surgery becomes a very large burden most owners are not willing to endure.
After hearing all sides of the issue and upon doing further research, I do not think the horse and carriage should be banned from the streets of NYC, although I do believe an accurate assessment of the situation is necessary. The technology of the horse and carriage has come and gone and therefore I think its necessity in the city should be questioned. For the aesthetic value the carriage rides add to the city, perhaps additional limitations should be given restricting their routes to appease both parties. In reaction to this specific accident, the driver of the carriage was inexperienced. Upon further research, I feel the carriage licensing and testing is inadequate. According to the following article in the NY Daily News, Risky Horseplay , no carriage driving demonstration is needed to obtain a license. A written test is taken as well as a test on administrating first aid to the horse is all that is examined. Perhaps a more rigorous examination is necessary to prevent future accidents due to inexperience. Overall, I do not believe the carriage rides should be completely taken away from the city for two reasons. The first reason would be the loss of work and community that has been established through the horse and carriage industry. The carriage drivers, owners, veterinarians, inspectors, blacksmiths, harnessmakers, the stable staff and the stables themselves would all be affected. The second reason is because of its gesture to preserve a historical pastime. With today's modern technology and the increased speed at which things move, it appears to be more appropriate for the carriage rides to be restricted to the parks. The following NYC blog provides additional information and perspectives from both positions, NYC metroblog.
During our class discussions, three definitive stances were taken on the controversy that stemmed from the horse and carriage accident in NYC. They went as follows: those in favor of keeping the horse drawn carriages, those in favor of removing the horse and carriages from the city streets and those who did not have a strong opinion for or against the issue. I was in the group in support of keeping the horse drawn carriages in the city. Our arguments for keeping the carriage business began with statics on horse and carriage accidents within the city. It was discovered that the occurrences were very low for accidents that resulted in the injury of the driver, others, and the death of a horse. Our second point of argument came from the vast amount of people to be affected by the termination of the horse and carriage business. The circle of influence extends far beyond the drivers and owners. Other areas that we felt needed to be clarified were: the recognition of the mounted police officers in NYC and the following question of where does one draw the line to the use of horses within the city; the fact that euthanasia is the primary method of treating a horse once it has become injured. It is very difficult and very expensive to operate on an injured horse. The recovery time and intensive care needed after surgery becomes a very large burden most owners are not willing to endure.
After hearing all sides of the issue and upon doing further research, I do not think the horse and carriage should be banned from the streets of NYC, although I do believe an accurate assessment of the situation is necessary. The technology of the horse and carriage has come and gone and therefore I think its necessity in the city should be questioned. For the aesthetic value the carriage rides add to the city, perhaps additional limitations should be given restricting their routes to appease both parties. In reaction to this specific accident, the driver of the carriage was inexperienced. Upon further research, I feel the carriage licensing and testing is inadequate. According to the following article in the NY Daily News, Risky Horseplay , no carriage driving demonstration is needed to obtain a license. A written test is taken as well as a test on administrating first aid to the horse is all that is examined. Perhaps a more rigorous examination is necessary to prevent future accidents due to inexperience. Overall, I do not believe the carriage rides should be completely taken away from the city for two reasons. The first reason would be the loss of work and community that has been established through the horse and carriage industry. The carriage drivers, owners, veterinarians, inspectors, blacksmiths, harnessmakers, the stable staff and the stables themselves would all be affected. The second reason is because of its gesture to preserve a historical pastime. With today's modern technology and the increased speed at which things move, it appears to be more appropriate for the carriage rides to be restricted to the parks. The following NYC blog provides additional information and perspectives from both positions, NYC metroblog.




